Supplementary Table 1. Differentially Expressed Genes Control vs. Ad-null

Supplementary Table 1. Differentially Expressed Genes Control vs. Ad.-IFNG

Supplementary Table 2. Differentially Expressed Genes 0 vs 3

Supplementary Table 1. Differentially Expressed Genes Ad.-IFNG vs. Ad-null

SuppTable4. PAM-derived PR signature selected on the bases of minimizing individual cross-validation errors for both PR-negative and PR-positive groups

SuppTable3. PAM-derived age signature selected on the bases of minimizing individual cross-validation errors for both old and young cohorts

Table 2. Meta-analysis  Cross-Validated SAGE Transcripts as Poor-Prognosis Breast Cancer Biomarkers; Up-modulated genes positively associated with the variable analyzed

Table 2. Meta-analysis  Cross-Validated SAGE Transcripts as Poor-Prognosis Breast Cancer Biomarkers; Down-modulated genes negatively associated with the variables analyzed

Table 3 Twenty-three genes included in the signature that predict poor prognosis

Table 2. Genes showing decreased transcript abundance in response to Sonic Hedgehog

Table 1. Genes showing increased transcript abundance in response to Sonic Hedgehog

Supplementary Table 3. List of the differentially regulated genes between E/F; Mx1-cre and transplanted recipient mice  (25; q   0.01)

TABLE 5. Top 40 differentially regulated genes in cells with activated EWS/FLI-1

Supplementary Table 4. The 924 probe sets differentially regulated in Lin  c-Kit  cells from E/F; Mx1-cre mice presumably represent genes important for the development of leukemia and potential target genes of EWS/FLI-1 in this cell background

Table S7. Genes changed basally with RIP140 siRNA ranked by p-value; Genes represent the same comparison as in Table 3 but are ranked by p-value for those genes with fold-change greater than 1.40. For genes with multiple probe sets  the probe set with best p-value was chosen.

Table 2. Genes changed basally with RIP140 siRNA

Table S6. Genes differentially expressed with RA in RIP140 siRNA cells ranked by p-value. Genes represent same comparisons as in Table 1 but are ranked by p-value for those genes with differential fold-change greater than 1.40