Supplemental Table B: 48 probe sets identical to a gene list (published by Ross et al) of classifiers of the top 100 chi-square probe sets selected for TEL-AML1

Supplemental Table A: 726 probe sets discriminating between TEL-AML1 positive and TEL-AML1 negative samples

Table S2b. SAM identification of 681 differentially expressed genes in group 2 comprised of tumor tissue and primary tumor cultures

Table S2a. SAM identification of 681 differentially expressed genes in group 1 comprised of immortal cell lines

SuppTable 2. Table S2: SAM identification of 681 differentially expressed genes in group 1 comprised of immortal cell lines  and group 2 comprised of tumor tissue and primary tumor cultures

Table S2 Mean values (n = 3) of the normalized raw data after filtering for significant changes are shown for the comparison of HT 29 spheroids virus HT 29 spheroids grown in the presence of EGCG.

Table S1 Mean values (n = 3) of the normalized raw data after filtering for significant changes are shown for the comparison of Control HT 29 cells vs. HT 29 spheroids.

SuppTable 1. 153 Up-regulated gene in diffuse-type gastric cancer

SuppTable 2. 1 553 Down-regulated genes in diffuse-type gastric cancer

Table 3. Genes differentially expressed between diffuse- and intestinal-type gastric cancers

Table 1. The 75 most upregulated genes in diffuse-type gastric cancera

Table 2. The 75 most downregulated genes in diffuse-type gastric cancera

Table 3. Eleven Transcripts Represented in Predictor Model with Highest Degree of Accuracy and Least Number of Genes Used in Model

Table 4. List of Potentially Biological Relevant Genes in Sporadic Parathyroid Neoplasia

Table 1 Differentially Expressed Genes in RE Treated RCC 54

TABLE II. Fifty Genes With Greatest Amplitude Loading Scores Along Principal Component 2.

TABLE 1. Clusters of genes regulated by EWS/FLI-1 in Ewing cells

Figure 1: Relatedness of the 15 lung samples and relative expression levels for each gene in each sample based on the 150-gene signature

Table E1: Differences in expression between NML  ADL  and EML